As most of the inqueries and limitation to competent working groups may be limited by a restricting authorisation of member states, so is the willing limitation imposed by Article 15 in the proposed directive. Why shall Member states have the power in adopting legislative measures restricting, in whole or in part, the data subject's rights of access to personal data relating to him or her self?
The proposed directive argues that asking for personal data may interfere with fiu properly fulfilling its task and that the 3 elements (prevention, investigation, and detection) proposed are not jeopardized.
The argent proposed by the authors of the directive has a double sided coin. It there is an individual investigated under this claims, the subject must have the right to know for what reasons and what purpose he or she ended up in the investigative procedure and wether it was justified or not. Such impleentarion may be fair and of use when all laws are cleard up so that abuse of hidden bank account when the owners do not know they exist, shall not be hold liable for a crime they did not commit.
And again, as only police channels will be used in this manner, until the states is not in pair with other directive and all the legal holes fixed, such restriction on rights under data protection regime shall never be applied. Individuals must have a right to know to obtain data dor defense and argumentation purposes. But, I will gice this article another thought before I break it into pieces.
No comments:
Post a Comment